NIST Standard Reference Database 106
Solubility System: m-Xylene with Water
Components: The original data in all these publications are compiled in the Data Sheets immediately following this Critical Evaluation. For convenience, further discussion of this system will be divided into three parts. 1. SOLUBILITY OF M-XYLENE (1) IN WATER (2) All the available data for the solubility of m-xylene in water at low temperatures (T ⤠343K) are summarized in Table 2 with the exception of the datum of Krzyzanowska and Szeliga (ref 11) which does not appear to be independent of that of Price (ref 10) and has therefore been excluded from consideration. The data are in general in reasonable agreement although with a few exceptions the agreement is insufficient for the average values to be Recommended. Selected data from Table 2 are plotted in Figure 1. Table 3 summarizes thermodynamic functions calculated by application of the vanât Hoff equation to the solubility data obtained over various temperature ranges. At low temperatures (T < 343K) the values of ΔHs1n and ΔCp,s1n from the data of Bohon and Claussen (ref 2) and Sanemasa et al. (ref 12) are in good agreement (Table 3) and are close to calorimetric values reported for similar systems (e.g. benzene in water, ref 13). However, the ΔH s1n derived from the data of Chernoglazova and Simulin (ref 9) is much too positive. 2. SOLUBILITY of M-XYLENE (1) IN WATER (2) AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES Solubility data for m-xylene in water at elevated temperatures (ca. 340-550K) and system pressure in sealed tubes have been reported by Pryor and Jentoft (ref 3) and Guseva and Parnov (ref 14). The results are plotted in Figure 2 and are clearly in poor agreement. In the absence of confirmatory studies it is difficult to know which values are more reasonable. However, it may be noted that the thermodynamic functions derived from the data of Pryor and Jentoft are more reasonable than those obtained from Guseva and Parnovâs work (Table 3). The interested user is referred to the relevant Data Sheets for the experimental values. 3. SOLUBILITY OF WATER (2) IN M-XYLENE (1) All the reported data for the solubility of water in m-xylene are collected in Table 4. The data from independent studies over a range of temperatures are in excellent agreement, enabling a number of values to be Recommended (Ïn~5% relative). Selected data from Table 4 are also plotted in Figure 3, which emphasizes the general agreement. Application of the vanât Hoff equation to the data of Englin et al. (ref 6) and Cherbigkaziva and Sunykub (ref 9) gives values for ΔHs1n of 21.3 and 24.9 kJ mo1-1 and for ΔCp,s1n of â152 and 208 J K -1 mo1-1 respectively. Comparison with related systems (e.g. water in benzene) suggests the data of Chernoglazova and Simulin (ref 9) may be more reliable. View Figure 2 for this Evaluation View Figure 3 for this Evaluation
(1) Water; H2O; [7732-18-5]NIST Chemistry WebBook for detail
(2) m-Xylene; C8H10; [108-38-3]NIST Chemistry WebBook for detail
Evaluator:
G.T. Hefter, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, W.A., Australia. January 1986. Critical Evaluation:
Quantitative solubility data for the m-xylene (1) â water (2) system have been reported in the publications listed in Table 1.Author T/K Reference Solubility Method Method Note Andrews and Keefer 274-313 1 (1) in (2) spectrophotometric - Bohon and Claussen 274-313 2 (1) in (2) spectrophotometric - Pryor and Jentoft 344-544 3 (1) in (2) synthetic - Guseva and Parnov 400-512 4 (1) in (2) unspecified a Hoegfeldt and Bolander 298 5 (2) in (1) Karl Fischer - Englin et al. 283-303 6 (2) in (1) analytical - Polak and Lu 273, 298 7 mutual GLC, Karl Fischer - Sutton and Calder 298 8 (1) in (2) GLC - Chernoglazova 293-343 9 mutual snythetic, GLC - Price 298 10 (1) in (2) GLC - Krzyzanowske and Szeliga 298 11 (1) in (2) GLC - Sanemasa et al. 288-318 12 (1) in (2) spectrophotometric - T/K Reference Sol. Power Solubility Sol. Note Best Sol. Power Best Solubility Best Sol. Note x1 Power x1 x1 Note 273 2, 7 2 2.10*, 1.96 g(1)/100g sln a 2 2.03 ± 0.07 (R) g(1)/100g sln b 5 3.44 (R) b 283 2 2 1.97* g(1)/100g sln a 2 2.0 g(1)/100g sln b 5 3.4 b 293 2, 9, 12 2 1.95*, 1.6, 1.60* g(1)/100g sln a 2 1.7 ± 0.2 g(1)/100g sln b 5 2.9 b 298 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12 2 1.73, 1.96, 1.62, 1.46, 1.7*, 1.34, 1.62 g(1)/100g sln a 2 1.6 ± 0.2 g(1)/100g sln b 5 2.7 b 303 2, 9, 12 2 1.98*, 1.8*, 1.65* g(1)/100g sln a 2 1.8 ± 0.1 g(1)/100g sln b 5 3.1 b 313 2, 9 2 2.19*, 2.2 g(1)/100g sln a 2 2.20 (R) g(1)/100g sln b 5 3.73 (R) b 323 9, 12 2 2.6*, 2.0* g(1)/100g sln a 2 2.3 ± 0.3 g(1)/100g sln b 5 3.9 b 333 9 2 3.2* g(1)/100g sln a 2 3.2 g(1)/100g sln b 5 5.4 b 343 3 2 3.5* g(1)/100g sln a 2 3.5 g(1)/100g sln b 5 5.9 b Author Reference Heat Capacity Enthalpy Bohon and Claussen 2 386 J K1 mol1 2.8 kJ mol1 Pryor and Jentofy 3 200 J K1 mol1 8.6 kJ mol1 Guseva and Parnov 4 55 J K1 mol1 36.7 kJ mol1 Chernoglazova and Simulin 9 167 J K1 mol1 11.4 kJ mol1 Sanemasa 12 317 J K1 mol1 2.6 kJ mol1 "Best" values Table 2 516 J K1 mol1 2.9 kJ mol1
View Figure 1 for this Evaluation T/K Reference Sol. Power Solubility Sol. Note Best Sol. Power Best Solubility Best Sol. Note x2 Power x2 x2 Note 273 7 2 1.88 g(2)/100g sln a 2 1.9 g(2)/100g sln b 3 1.1 b 283 6, 7 2 2.89, 2.8* g(2)/100g sln a 2 2.9 ± 0.1 (R) g(2)/100g sln b 3 1.7 (R) b 293 6, 7, 9 2 4.02, 3.7*, 3.4 g(2)/100g sln a 2 3.7 ± 0.3 (R) g(2)/100g sln b 3 2.2 (R) b 298 5, 6, 7, 9 2 4.4, 4.7*, 4.32, 4.0 g(2)/100g sln a 2 4.4 ± 0.3 (R) g(2)/100g sln b 3 2.6 (R) b 303 6, 9 2 5.36, 4.8 g(2)/100g sln a 2 5.1 ± 0.3 (R) g(2)/100g sln b 3 3.0 (R) b 313 9 2 6.7 g(2)/100g sln a 2 6.7 g(2)/100g sln b 3 6.7 b 323 9 2 10* g(2)/100g sln a 2 10 g(2)/100g sln b 3 5.9 b 333 9 2 14* g(2)/100g sln a 2 14 g(2)/100g sln b 3 8.3 b 343 9 2 19* g(2)/100g sln a 2 19 g(2)/100g sln b 3 11 b
Table 1aThe synthetic method was probably used.
Table 2aValues marked with an asterisk (*) have been obtained by the Evaluator by graphical interpolation of the authors' original data.
Table 2bObtained by averaging where appropriate; σn has no statistical significance.
Table 4aValues marked with an asterisk (*) have been obtained by the Evaluator by graphical interpolation of the authors' original data.
Table 4bCalculated by averaging where appropriate; σn has no statistical significance. References: (Click a link to see its experimental data associated with the reference)
1Andrews, L.J.; Keefer, R.M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 3644-77.
2Bohon, R.L.; Claussen, W.F., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 1571-8.
3Pryor, W.A.; Jentoft, R.E., J. Chem. Eng. Data 1961, 6, 36-7.
4Guseva, A.N.; Parnov, E.I., Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Khim. 1963, 18, 76-9.
5Hoegfeldt, E.; Bolander, B., Ark. Kemi 1964, 21, 161-86.
6Englin, B.A.; Plate, A.F.; Tugolukov, V.M. Pryanishnikova, M.A., Khim. Tekhnol. Topl. Masel 1965, 10, 42-6.
7Polak, J.; Lu, B.C.Y., Can. J. Chem. 1973, 51, 4018-23.
8Sutton, C.; Calder, J.A., J. Chem. Eng. Data 1975, 20, 320-2.
9Chernoglazova, F.S.; Simulin, Yu.N., Zh. Fiz. Khim. 1976, 50, 809. Deposited doc. 1976, VINITI 3528-75.
10Price, L.C., Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 1976, 60, 213-44.
11Krzyzanowska, T.; Szeliga, J., Nafta (Katowice) 1978, 12, 413-7.
13Gill, S.J.; Nichols, N.F.; Wadso, I. J., Chem. Thermodyn. 1976, 8, 445-52.